``Again when Higgins asked Moore whether he was co-inventor on 336 he was acting SOLELY ON BEHALF OF FISH!!!``
You consider this binding material ? If Higgins had asked that question...it had better have been more specfic.
``this could not beconsidered joint simply on the grounds of Fish`s letter stating that he is the sole inventor of 336``
That letter had better be very specific...as to where his idea fits into the items of 336.
Have you read 336...it involves more than just the clocking feature. The main objective of 336 is to eliminate static memory....creating a 32 bit package configured with an internal bus structure...for direct manipulation of DRAM...utilizing 4 distinct 8bit instruction registers then pumped into multiplexer ...sitting along side of a request instruction fetch ahead....etc
an RISC microprocessor...``20 MIPS for 20 bucks``
My point...
336 is a complete makeup of a sh-boom microprocessor...one IC consisting of two CPU items....from the I/O of the memory controller...into the makings of the DMA CPU and the main CPU.
It`s going to take hard facts to nail down the Fish idea written into 336 as to exact ownership....not idle hearsay of 336.
doni
