``Technically, anything like this which would be adverse to Moore`s position is not hearsay because there is a special rule of evidence which classifies such statements as ``admissions``, or more fully, ``admissions against one`s own interest``

``hearsay`` is always adverse to some ones position...what makes this a special rule above all other ?

Without witness or taken under deposition....IMO..the conversation means nothing....it`s just black and white for me.

scenario...Moore does not recall that conversation and his name is on the patent at the foremost ....Higgins claim will be worth 50% to Fish and 3rd removed 25% to PTSC

witnessed would be worth 75% to Fish ...50% to PTSC

deposition/affidavit 100%

What do they have ?

doni