and it's obvious to me that this "all about the money".

Having read it, I think my conjecture still holds water to a large degree, the basis is just twisted a bit.

It does sound kind of goofy for them to state that they continued negotiations and meetings, for 14 months, right up through Jan '08, regarding a license for technology they now claim that they don't infringe. It just would appear that if a "nuisance" value license was not in the offing, the T3 would have told our team to take a hike after the first few encounters. That is, if they truly feel they don't infringe.

JMHOs,

SGE