"supply chain disruptions" versus "disrupt...time-to-market deliveries"

If a company suffers problems in its supply chain, they are not able to deliver their products to the markets in the usual time.

Thus the one is a consequence of the other, thus it's absolutely correct to translate the phrase "supply chain disruptions" to a more practical phrase, which states more clearly, what the current negotiations between TPL and potential companies are all about:

It's no more the question, if they are infringing, it's the question, if they are willing to prevent massive negative effects on their business by paying NOW.

GLTY