It was my understanding that the cost of a licence was based on the number of times the infringer used our technology in his products. Isn't possible that these lower paying licence's paid at the going rate but that we miscalculated the number of products they actually sold? Why else would they pay if they didn't infringe and why would we take less than we felt we had coming? Selling now makes no sense. The stock has a future. We have cash, and as Yogi would say, that's just like money. Don't let the mm steal your stock. They are trying. So the stock may not go to $20.00 as the hypsters have been saying. What's wrong with $2.50. doc