It is not "missing something"; that implies something nefarious.

I believe it includes its due share of PDS income/expense. But the question is, what did PDS include (thus far, or to the end of the reporting period in question).  Obviously if it is a royalty deal, they would only record those amounts earned through their reporting period, and then we would only record our share of that. 

To me, one who was liking the lump sum deals, it would be ironic if indeed there was a royalty deal, because all those who were harping about the necessity of recurring royalties may have gotten what they wanted -- they just don't know it  .... and are now really whining.  On the other hand, if there was a decent lump sum settlement, we undoubtedly would have seen it plain as day in the Q.  Careful what you wish for, I guess.