Do you think that the business resolution method of settlement may be applied to other infringing companies such as the A's as a way to continue the licensing program now that TPL is trying to extract more $ from infringers?  That is to grant a license for the MMP with the terms set and collection after the patents pass or fail the USPTO re-examination or whatever factors are in the J's settlement.

Your guess is as good as mine, but it might explain why the February licenses weren't included in the 10Q. Obviously, the license fees might not have been received in time for inclusion.

Be well