Those who licensed the mmp for past use are posted on the sites.

In other words one time payers who payed are listed.

Those who have a GRANT are not listed because they are not users yet????? This may possibly be their way of skirting the infringement claim. We want to use it now but we didn't then? "Stretch I know"

In RG's letter it says "Each MMP™ portfolio licensing negotiation is unique with respect to the customer’s use of the MMP™ portfolio technology, as assessed by TPL (in explicit technical detail), the costs associated with pursuing the customer licenses and other considerations.

I did not add the brackets they were there.

I think they will be paying based on royalties after the (explicit technical detail is figured out) and thus possibly why the MOU with the Judge? Waiting ti finalize the terms / agreements.

I don't know, I give up.

JMHO