The recent critique of Jim Turley's oratory based on a couple of paragraphs from the EETimes is very interesting. It is demonstrative of how differently people read things.

To me, the article on his remarks indicated that he was discussing royalties, which we have never collected....we get one time payments, and primarily his experiences with ARC. Criticising his sense of humor, when you weren't there, is an impossible task. The written word does not come across in the same way that the spoken word does. (You obviously don't care for my sense of humor, either.)

IMO, the beating given to Jim Turley may be one of the most pitiful things that have been done on this board. We had an honest CEO who did what he was able to do. He did what he could to distance us from Swartz (which seemed at one time the thing that investors wanted most). I think he had issues with the BOD, some of which many still complain about, and his departure from PTSC may have been due to those issues.

Hindsight is twenty-twenty. In the future, many here would do well to think for themselves rather than to follow others blindly.

Just my opinion, of course.