Brian has more shares than the entire BOD, wouldn't it be in his best interest as well as ours to have things transpire in favor of share price appreciation?

Unless someone can tell me, I thought he was in no way compensated for his role.

I believe, from what has been posted, that Brian SHR was to voice the concern of the shareholders. In doing so was he not asked to sign an NDA sort of doc. Once a person recieves privilage information does that not mean he can not share that information to the public?

Brian lack of communication because he became an insider is sinister? Why not hold the BOD to the same standard as Brian?

Obiviously Brian is now able to communicate, so what happened? Who gave him the go ahead?

Don't you think that Brian was unhappy to see the share price de-appreciate from mid Two's to the cents? So why did he not communicate with the share holders? Maybe just because he was not allowed?

I still think the blame is misdirected! Why would you not hold accountable the source (employees and BOD of PTSC) for your cirtisicism?

Sometimes I am completely baffled by some of thoughts that goes on this forum.

glta

Tom