Very busy lately and only have time to really just scan most posts that have two thumbs up or better. I may be missing something but I find it very helpful with the number of posts lately, in order to catch up.

Back to the point. With TPL's focus on pursuing companies who manufacture end user systems that incorporate chips that infringe....and not the specific companies that supply the chips......is ARM off the hook so to speak? Does this decision downplay the signficance of the 584 review and appeal on claim 29? Or is it the other way around, and until we get validation of the 584, there is no point in going after ARM and others. I don't think we saw this distinction on the part of TPL until the recent pr's. Excuse me IF Ihave this wrong and this has been discussed but again...are we now seeing a pursuit of end user systems exclusively and why?