I keep asking "where's the incentive?

for Swartz:

I'm not sure Swartz would even be a player here... he already put over $100M (probably closer to $150M) in profits under his matress thanks to PTSC, you, me and all retail.. but.. Lecky & TPL have to fund:

From Leckeone himself @ April '07 SHM (one yr ago, props to Virt):

Dan Leckrone (The Elder), who seems in a good mood today. Presents a PowerPoint presentation.

TPL – Global Intellectual Property Development & Management Company made up of TPL, Alliacense, and Intellasys

Home to 32K sq.ft office and 200 employees. New home in a very nice location in Northern California. Intellasys has 8 Design Centers & 3 Sales offices overseas – Paris, Switzerland, Taiwan, I think.

Alliacense executes TPL licensing programs, currently 30 employees and growing rapidly.

Intellasys has 150 people – 40 PhDs, 80 Masters. All support Alliacense. Core competency is semi-conductor devices covering microprocessor arrays, memory management & control – Flash, and HDTV networking and security. An incomparable array of technical expertise – MMP related; also supports Alliacense MMP program on demand

TPL – 30 people, 40 outside lawyers. Corporate support. Core competency – IPA development and litigation management.

---------

I'm not sure if this inludes the costs of TT&C... Leckerone gets to fund this (his portion).. every month.. How much does TPL burn thru each month? Perhaps Swartz would consider reinvesting in the MMP, this time via TPL.. however and for whatever 'purpose/s'.. Either way.. I'm fairly confident Swartz is happy with his results regarding his 'financing' here...

.

"where's the incentive?

for PTSC management/BoD:

Heck, this one is easy... CJ, Jr & Gloria get to be BoD members for life.. collect their $200-250k per yr for saying 'you bet' at a few meetings every yr.. let the cheap options mount, and sell them if/when the sp happens to appreciate.

.

I never get an answer, other than something ambiguous - ignoring the legalities.

Is the above full of illegalities?

I guess you give no credence to any of my postulating in our previous discussion.. so be it.