if you read further in to the argument, one of the things being argured

by Quanta is that LG did NOT clearly spell out in the INTEL agreement

that the license did not cover downstream clients.

I think the SC will NOT throw the baby out with the bath water and instead

rule for some changes in HOW the contracts/licenses are evoked.

That's my opinion. Why completley change something that has worked

well for several hundred years? Just tweak it a bit to make it clearer/better

for all involved Just as with our Healthcare system. Don't overhaul

the whole doggone thing. Let's start with guarantee issue down to one

person and then give business owners some help with tax breaks or

supplements to offset the Higher costs they WILL face with guarantee

issue and LOTS more unhealthy people coming in to the insurance pool.

Gotta think ahead as to the ramifications of each and every decision.

Kind of like playing Chess. If I move here or there, then my opponent

will move here of there. What's the best way to go??

And that's how I think Roger Cook/TPL has stategized throughout this

entire process with the MMP..............like a Chess game.

My money's on Roger Cook and a Check Mate. :-))

GLTA

deb