If that's the case could our S/P be an indication as to what is in the letter? I know it could be argued the volume would be much higher but then again why have they allowed it to drift so low? Could Ease be correct in what he postulated a few weeks ago? Perhaps some of the claims have been rejected. I certainly could explain the downward pressure that's been present for the last 2 - 3 weeks. We could certainly surmise the price would really fall once that information became public. I know it wouldn't be the end because we still have the re-exam and appeal. Just wondering, since you brought the information forward. Are we already seeing the content of the letter?