'584 claim 29 bandwagon after the Markman yet, the '148 and '336 are being put through the wringer without regard for the Markman. Perhaps I don't understand all the legal correlations and USPTO procedures but it seems odd nonetheless. It gets my attention when the examiner seems to go out of their way to imply obviousness between what appears to be very different patents. I hope it truly is a simple matter of leaving no stone unturned.