Re: OK let's take another tact - Sedley
in response to
by
posted on
Jul 17, 2008 09:05AM
There is no need to take "another tact". Especially if you're going to begin with:
"Obviously our board is a most pro-BOD group. For you folks who feel that the BOD shouldn't be questioned, besides Holocom and the RG hiring, can you name an accomplishment by the BOD?"
Has ANYONE here said they were "pro-BoD"? Find ONE.
Has ANYONE said that "the BoD shouldn't be questioned"? Find ONE.
And I can go on:
Has ANYONE said that the BoD compensation shouldn't be re-evaluated and redone in some fashion, e.g., tied to PPS performance? Find ONE.
Has ANYONE said recently (in the last two years) that the dividends, in hindsight, were a smart move (especially the last two)? Find ONE.
Has ANYONE said that they're really glad that they invested in a now troubled investment instead to buying out S&L or more stock? Find ONE.
Has ANYONE said that they really liked the funding arrangements with S&L? Find ONE.
Has ANYONE said that they're glad that Ignite and Inflame are collecting dust? Find ONE.
Has ANYONE said that they're glad they dumped the GPR business/tech? Find ONE.
Has ANYONE said they're glad that they ended actions to refine the Plasma Antennea Tech? Find ONE.
Has ANYONE said that they wish PTSC had never bought out Nanotech (or whatever it was)? Find ONE.
Well, that hits everything I can think of off the top that anyone can bitch about, covering the last 15 years.
It just amazes me that people suggest that there are contrary opinions here when it is simply not the case. IMO we're all pretty like-minded about every one of the above. But some can't quite grasp this fact, or the fact that it's all ancient history.
Regarding the BoD, I ask again, are the naysayers mad at the current BoD for selecting RG? For allowing RG to communicate more frequently and with greater detail re: near term plans? Do you dislike the plans, approved by the BoD? Get current. This is not a "defense", but a reality check.
And I'm fairly certain that NOBODY posting on this board will be voting FOR any of the "problem" BoD members. Assuming this is your mission - consider it accomplished.
Why? And why should you stop the repetitive posts on the subject? And why should you not waste your time addressing ANY of the ancient history listed above?
Well, it's because:
We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it!We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it!We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it!We get it! We get it!We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it!We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it!We get it! We get it!We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it!
We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it!We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it!We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it!We get it! We get it!We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it!We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it!We get it! We get it!We get it! We get it! We get it! We get it!
So the only practical reason for your continued posting on these subjects, on which we are all in basic agreement, would be to bash.
JMHOs,
SGE