Seems to me that a company earns their PE ratio in a way. Here’s how. When a company looks like they could capture something huge and their management has proven themselves competent, they will command a higher PE ratio. When a management has shown time and time again they are unable to capitalize upon opportunities, they get a low PE ratio. Steady companies tend to “average” out between the “going to the moon” companies and the dogs. RG is slowly and steadily repairing the damage to PTSC management credibility. As he does this and then, when, an opportunity comes along (like patent verification or continued acquisitions), then our PE ratio could change radically as investors start to view PTSC differently. How many of us have been disappointed with PTSC? Big time. When we start rolling again, if things fall in place in our favor, I figure we trade at a PE above the average. When we apply to Nasdaq, we will have a huge spike. We just need some validity to the excitement many of us have for our future. RG is working that. That part of the equation looks good. The money being spent on Alliacense is suspect. FWIW.