I agree , it's the BOD's option to make this proposal to us, of ocurse RG had his input and ideas on what to do , but ultimately, it is their responsibility.

Also, I don't think anyone here is going to say they are smarter than RG when it comes to what is going on at PTSC...but it's not about who is smarter, it's about what is right for the market PPS and the common shareholders.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/26720574

If you have the time watch the interview or read the comments of the new CEO at Wachovia, which many think is on the brink like Lehman...his remarks are very close to what we need at PTSC. he mentions that the biggest problem at Lehman and others, was lack of ...transparency.

You have to give the investors out there an open window look at the company. like Merrill did, instead of going under, like Lehman, they were bought by B fo A, why because their business was alot more open and transparent to dissect for an investment.

If there was anything I'd prefer from our leadership, RG included, along with the BOD, it is more transparency and explanations of what we expect from our latest deals and where we see the future revenue of the MMP to be...at least on a EPS basis...the more open this company becomes(taking into account there are MDA's to deal with)....100Mm more shares or not...the better it will be for us the owners and the company itself with repsect to new investors coming in and the PPS growing at an acceptable rate.

JMHO