<Swartz was selling into every piece of good news. Is he still doing it? The jury's out on that because, now that his holding is below the limit required for disclosure, no one knows how many he has or whether he still sells into good news.>

Well, we do know that Swartz was responsible for pps decline up until the point he went under the reporting limit.

And since that point we see much good news and the pps continues to fall unexplainably defying all logic. Hmmmm

Perhaps 1+1 = Swartz. Opty