What is it you dont understand about the legal posts...it's the legal ramifications(PTO included) that will hol dback any license payments that we are all hoping will commence shortly...but may take longer than we would hope for...

Why would they continue to fight? What is it that I am missing?

Because of the following and also maybe due to much higher demands of licensing fees...as long as they think they can win on non-infringement...they'll go to court..esp. with aq higher fee demand...once they assume they can't win on non-infringement...they and all those watching these cases will settle quickly..jmho

they are claiming... NON-INFRINGEMENT

from the Q...

The Asustek case seeks declaratory relief that its products do not infringe enforceable claims of the '336, '584 and '749 patents. The Asustek case also seeks a similar declaration with respect to two patents owned by TPL that are not a part of the MMP Portfolio, and as such we are not engaged in this aspect of the litigation and defense. The Acer case seeks declaratory relief that its products do not infringe enforceable claims of the '336, '584 and '749 patents. The HTC case similarly seeks declaratory relief that its products do not infringe enforceable claims of those three patents and the '148 patent.