Thanks to wolfpackvolt:

12. Beginning in or about December 2005 and continuing thereafter, Alliacense has demanded that Plaintiffs enter into a royalty-bearing license for the patents-in-suit. Alliacense has taken the position that certain products of Plaintiffs are “covered” by one or more claims of the patents-in-suit. Alliacense further told Plaintiffs that if they did not take a license to the patents-in-suit, Plaintiffs might be subject to substantial liabilities. Alliacense also provided claim charts purporting to describe how more than ten products of Plaintiffs allegedly infringe one or more claims of the patents-in-suit.
13. Alliacense and HTC met multiple times throughout 2006 and 2007 to discuss a possible license, with the most recent meeting having taken place at HTC’s headquarters in Taoyuan, Taiwan on November 8, 2007. Throughout this period, Alliacense continued to
demand that Plaintiffs take a license to the patents-in-suit. For example, on October 9, 2007, Alliacense sent HTC a memorandum advising that “if HTC wishes to postpone its licensing,” then “HTC’s products are exposed to litigation and ITC actions.” Plaintiffs and Alliacense continued to discuss a possible license during the following months, but the parties were unable to reach an agreement

http://agoracom.com/ir/patriot/messa...

Be well