At the risk of misintepreting milestone, I think the point that milestone is making is that ease has inferred that the 2 separate patent portfolios are being marketed/licensed together, as if negotiations for both are done at the same time and Alliacense tries to license them together. It seems he wants to infer this based on the fact that the lawsuit initiated by the T3 includes both portfolios. We have never seen any proof of such a scenario. Milestone is stating ease is putting out disinformation by his inference.

I agree. Unless ease can put up some proof or clarify the above interpretation I have made of his posts.