You make a good point and it's one that I've wondered about since shareholders reported back to this board after the SHM. I'm not sure how anyone could take Mr. Leckrone's behavior as ordinary or normal. Someone should have politely asked him why he was taking such an active roll in the meeting and answering on behalf of the company. I know of no other situation were a retail shareholder would have been allowed to intervene so many times. The man is neither an officer or majority stake holder, therefore, it is very strange that he was afforded so much lead way in asserting himself. It has bothered me every since other investors reported his behavior. I would think that PTSC mgmt was not pleased. Any shareholder with half a brain would have walked out scratching their head. That kind of behavior is the creator of rampant conspiracy theories.