"Those MOU words of your's would be in the settlement agreement, not in an MOU (unless they just wanted to add unnecessary paper, and attach it to the settlement agreement)."

SGE - that's not what I was told.

I respect your difference of opinion - this is what discussion boards are all about.

Can you explain:

1) How RG could buy shares if he knew money from the J-3 could possibly be forthcoming (and the public does not know?) Also, why would he tell us that there's absolutely nothing more coming from the J-3s and the case is done/over?

2) How could TPL possibly keep this information from RG when Patriot was also a Plaintiff in the case?

You really should consider speaking with a patent/litigation attorney if you can. These aren't matters we can guess at or create "well what if" scenarios with any level of competence.