Not that much would refer to the amount of product. That is why I referred to the situation we had in discovery. We were claiming chip families that infringed the whole time in our pre-suit negoiations with them. Then when we used the chip families in our discovery, they objected, the judge ruled that we had to name with documentation specific chips. I believe he gave us more time, but more than likely not enough to enter all specific chips in products that were infringing. IMO that was a major factor in the low settlement and hence the statement not infringing that much. We were out smarted, lazy in preparation, and not prepared to present the whole of our evidence.

I believe the J's tactic was to bury us in last minute paper work. I thinK it worked.