You could be right, but with the NDA we can only speculate why the settlement was so low. Which brings up an interesting point. Do future litigates have a right to know about the details of an NDA? I would think they would if it pertains to their case. How do they set a precedent for case law if it is unknown? If that is the case we should, in the future as the T's case progresses, be getting a lot of hints as to why the J's settlement was so low.