Forgive for disagreeing with you. Your post seems contradictory. On the one hand you seem to be saying that RG is responsible for the PPS. On the other hand you say the market is responsible for the PPS (which I believe is the case. The PPS is one metric by which to judge the performance of the company, a metric so many seem to be focused on. But their are many more important metrics that are far more important, such revenue growth, overall financial health, etc. Those other metrics are within the control of a company's management and I would submit but those measures RG has done very well. He has provide a strategy and executed a business paln to provide a sustainable and predictable revenue stream. That is what investors look for, not some potential windfall from licensing. RG can not control the market and can not control the PPS any more than he can control the weather.

So, again forgive me for not endorsing your post as I have done so many times in the past.