What are your thoughts about the following possibly being a thorn in the side of TPL/Alliacense getting licenses?

Just before the announcements of the remaining J2.5 setteling in east Texas we were waiting for the Judge to rule on whether or not he would allow a CA. court pacer being allowed during trial. If I remember correctly the pacer was concerning a conversation between Moore and his lawyer from the TPL / PTS court case. We never found out what the judge ruled but we do know immediately after all parties submitted to the court their position on this issue settlements were agreed to and they walked off for all we know nearly scot free.

I remember a gut wrenching feeling in the pit of my stomach when the J2.5 potitioned the court without TPL/PTSC lawyers agreeing for an additinal stay. A day or two later I remember TPL/PTSC lawyers agreeing and we found out via another submittal to the court for the same thing only this time all parties were in agreement and were mentioned.

This led me to believe the J2.5 were working from a foundation of strength if you will.

When I asked way back then everyone said no way. Maybe no way was the correct answer but for the life of me I can't believe how reluctant TPL/Alliacense is to move forward when they appear to have gained strength from the German Patent decision.

I am as puzzled as you.

Can you help with the above please?

If not thanks for all the posting you do and for taking the time to read this.

JMHO

Wanabe