The examiner takes endless months and ....93.....paragraphs of technical jargon and wording issues...in some very deep depth....but then hangs his hat on the reject that...as he says ....in paragraph 93...

93. For these reasons, I believe that a person of ordinary skill in the art would understand that

There was no one of ordinary skill years ago that had this kind of obviousness related to our patents...heck it took this guy how much tiome and digging just to come to his conclusions...let alone having to spell it all out in his treatise for the world to read.....

And now he denies our patent that it was obvious to someone of ORDINARY skilll...no way...his own rejection response should be evidence enough that no one of ORDINARY skill could have put 2+ 2 together and have it equal his epiphany...

Heck I might be tempted to use his own rejection explanation against his own argument of being obvious to someone with ORDINARY skill.