<I believe Moore would go solo with his Licensing rather then team up with PTSC. He certainly wouldn't have the depth of resources at his disposal as TPL has (with or without PTSC), but then I think he would enact a different type of licensing and prosecution methodology which would require less "oranization" and allow for an even easier path to licensing.>

Interesting take.......Why wouldn't PTSC want to go down any road that leads to active licensing, greater control, and less overhead vs. litigation?

< I'll also opine that RG likely wants to stay far away from the MMP machinations>

If Moore is rightful in his ownership, then we would be further away from the MMP structure as we now know it (Lecky is out of the picture). Secondly, if Moore's chip works have merit, the potential is someone else picks him up, he goes through a litigation period with TPL and we our holding the bag until this is all resolved to either stay with the old agreement with TPL or possibly have to negotiate with a new entity down the road (another joint unification) all the while the patent clock is ticking away.........Infringers may see this as another court challenge delay opportunity.......IMO......