This was up just before he removed the entire section. I'm sure some of you saw it but just in case. The statement below seems strange coming from a man whose done countless patents with the USPTO. That's right Mr. Moore the USPTO has no concern with who actually owns the patent. They just receive applications from anyone and assign patents to whomever. Rightful ownership is a non-issue with them. This is just a re-exam procedure were the USPTO is supposedly interacting with the rightful owner in an attempt to recertify the patent. Is he serious?
Moore v TPL
TPL claims that posting this information will interfere with the MMP licensing program. I certainly don't want or intend to interfere. I have agreed not to.
Our agreement stipulates that disputes be resolved by Arbitration. But Leckrone claims that exercising that right would interfere.
Patriot thinks an ownership dispute might affect the '336 patent re-examination. But the dispute exists whether I post it or not. And surely the validity of a patent is independent of who owns it.
These issues have been brewing for years. The only interest I've gotten in resolving them was with these postings. If I'm muzzled, I'll lose any hope of negotiating royalty payments and clearing my title to MMP. That will have to await Arbitration (6-9 months).
What to do? I'm thinking about it.