Please do not remove this flagged post as I have no problem whatsoever with its contents. Thank you.
Re: '336, "Much ado about nothing" "FUD" ? LOL, is that why
posted on Apr 07, 09 07:51PM
As to your,
EVEN IF ALL PARTIES SIMUTANEOUSY STAND TOGETHER BEFORE THE PTO.
"wouldn't that indicate settlement of the outstanding issues?"
No, it would not. Showing a concerted front to the PTO on issues of "Obviousness" and/or "Prior Art" is VERY different than settling on a dispute of equitable ownership on the underlying patents.
It's becoming quite obvious you have analytical comprehension difficulties.
Your other post nonsense I read quickly and found not worthy of a comment.
My Ts & Os
http://agoracom.com/ir/patriot/forum...
Be well
