You cite an ARM PR as being the definitive conclusion to the '584 litigation, whereas you know it was about the then Markman that was appealed.

My post was to show that ARM twisted the truth of the Texas dismissal and to show that there is still the alleged infringement of the '749, for which I believe ARM initiated a re-examination request.

Conveniently, the German decision was not mentioned as a potential avenue to prosecute ARM, nor was the fact that there is nothing legally to prevent TPL returning to court on the '584.

E&OE

Be well