to be very black and white, no grey areas. The paragraph cited by Wolfpack simply acknowledges that while the Appellate Court agrees with the claims construction set forth by the lower court, therefore admonishing ARM from any infringement, it does not impact the ongoing USPTO re-exam. It in no way implies that ARM may be back on the hook. That decision would be soley at the discretion of TPL as to whether or not they want to fight that battle again. Read the stories below, in order, and it will remind you of exactly what transpired before and after the appeal. Dan Leckrone stated ARM was the hook for the '584 and the '749. His statement was made before the Appellate court ruled in favor of the lower, thus releasing ARM. IMO the recert of the '584 has no bearing on ARM unless TPL decides to take them on, again.

http://eetimes.eu/showArticle.jhtml?...

http://eetimes.eu/design/207603111