I did a quick perusal of the IFW documents filed yesterday & today. We responded to the Examiner's commentary from his reasons for ending the re-exam with some language that said the examiner's reference to "microloops" should not be considered as applying to claim 29, and some other exceptions that essentially indicated while they appreciate the recert, they don't concede anything, lol. Frankly, I don't know how to make sense of it, ie. don't know if it's typical patent recert manuervering, or if it opens up a ball of wax, or if it simply is TPL protecting it's legal positions. Hopefully, emtnester or others who have experience can shed some light. Also, because of the security measures needed to navigate to the IFW site (at least the way I go in - there may be simpler ways for smarter people), it's not easy to cut an paste the links, but I'd recomment going in and reading the doucments as at the least, it's interesting to see how the process works.