I would agree that at this point in time the MMP's success will aid in the building of PTSC into somthing bigger, faster. But we have seen evidence by past CEO's that success with the MMP does not neccessarily equate to success as a company. Mismangaement of revenues can come back to haunt PTSC if the revenue is foolishly applied. Just how important do you think it would be to have someone like RG at the helm instead of Pohl? Where would PTSC be now? What other aquisitions would PTSC have made?

The future of PTSC will ultimately not be the MMP, however the foundation for the future is being laid by the MMP. RG has little control over the MMP but what RG is trying to do will encourage long term investment in PTSC. I think he knows with the life span of the MMP that the long term future is dependent on his actions and that the SP will more than likely increase to much higher levels because PTSC is trying to be more than the MMP, rather than just the MMP.

At this juncture the USPTO has more control over the MMP than mr. Leckrone or RG. Until the USPTO is done there isn't a whole lot that anyone can say about the MMP. The share price will be more affected by the USPTO decision and the money that will be reported from the licensing of the MMP than anything that RG or Leckrone has to say about it. But I do believe the share price will increase to a higher level with the actions of a good CEO as opposed to just the success of the MMP.

What is important for the future of PTSC is to have a good CEO making decisions with the revenue generated by the MMP that will add value and build this company from a penney stock to a NASDAQ type company.

I understand your constant and predictable negativity towards PTSC and management.

All the best,

Steve