Perhaps a coincidence, but I find this interesting, and furthers my thinking on the 584 and ARM.

If you go to the 584 reexam IFW and look at the February 9th interview summary, you will note the following: That summary says that the examiner is in agreement with the amended wording of claim 29 and it put the claim in condition for confirmation.

This means that the attorney's representing reexam requestors were notified of the above in the same time frame. Now the NIRC was posted April 21, but I would assume ARM knew what was about to happen months earlier. I would further assume subsequent to receipt of that interview summary they may have contacted TPL/PTSC to see what could be worked out to avoid litigation.

With the April 9th letter from RG we get the famous statement regarding the many opportunities and activities and we can't talk about the MMP anymore. Some thought it had something to do with the Moore spat. Some thougt MMP for sale. But it did seem like something was up for sure.

And now we withdrew the 584 from the case with ACER.

Am I dilusional? Or is there some connection with all the above?

Opty