any entity with a sufficient holding can play the price, be it S&L, as alleged, or any other. For example, sell 100,000 @ .40, which were previously purchased @.10. Sell more at .30, profit $50,000. Wait for price to drop further, then buy again. One now has 400,000 shares instead of the 200,000 when the play started, albeit at higher cost basis. There could still be a core holding purchased @ .10 with which to average down the net holding price.

Wait for price to rise again, repeat.

Why does it appear that those demanding a PR for the '336 recert are now thinking that perhaps it wasn't the wisest request to have made?

.

.

Be well