Most of what is in the latest reexam request has been considered in prior exams. Exception is Richter. But while we wait for details of exactly what the examiner is rejecting on I wanted to review the prior art.
Now Mostek was included in the pubpat request in 90/008474. Date reexam authorized and posted was 4/5/07. But I don't see the arguments made against against the prior art. Would like to see how they argued Mostek previously. Can anyone find it?
Thanks, Opty