I noticed the second word in you message is “assuming.” Then I got to the third paragraph where it says “logically” I believe that is logic based on assumption. Then I saw assuming to begin two more paragraphs. Then I was lost on the trigonometry paragraph. I am not an E.E. and cannot form a valuable opinion on circuitry however; I can equate those SNQ’s into their simplest form. It is like saying,

“In the last reexamination we asked you to consider peanut butter.

Then we asked you to consider jelly.

In this reexamination we would like you to consider peanut butter and jelly at the same time.

In the last paragraph I realize you have read the document Determination Rexamination orderd. Then at the bottom of the page I noticed you just skimmed it. I would go back and read it instead of making assumptions. Things are less confusing that way. It starts on page 2 and I usually skip over the patent description. All the answers are there.

IMHO I don’t see any threat since they are not bringing anything new to the reexamination. In fact I can read something in the new order to reexamination that is not there. Based on fact, not assumption. They are grasping at straws.

Page 2

#3

“A cover page from EDN magazine, dated November 20, 1976, appears to have been attached to the Mostek reference.”

You are trying to tell me that the strategy of some of the most brilliant legal minds in the world has to resort to trying to glue a cover page off of an old magazine on to a technical manual and attempt to slide it by. It wasn’t stapled and it wasn’t paper clipped it “appeared to be attached” that is the examiner’s way of having a laugh. How many hours was client billed for that. Maybe it was a freebie since they had the sectary do it.