Brian or anyone, please advise.

While I can agree to parts of what's stated here, there's one thing I just don't get. That is, how is it suddenly (or even not so suddenly) "make or break" time, or the last, "last chance" for PTSC's BoD?

The complaint has been that the BoD reside in their position and in the opinion of many make bad decisions and should somehow be removed from their position. But nobody, ever, has come up with a viable way to make that happen. They are a fixture until they choose otherwise, it appears.

But now, somehow, there is some phantom threat that they must respond to; some unseen/unknown pressure they're feeling. What is it? Shareholder unrest that's existed, at various levels by various shareholders, since day one? I don't get it.

Perhaps this is all based on the fact that PTSC enlisted the aid of Baroni and Co. toward making some serious changes, to "transform" the company, just as many here demand. Somehow, their action to do exactly what shareholders seem to want is due to some perceived threat. What is it?

And why can't it be as simple as this: The BoD actually want to do something for the benefit of PTSC, its shareholders, and themselves (through their stock/options holdings) by enhancing the potential of the company. Is this beyond the realm of reason?

This is not necessarily intended to be in defense of the BoD or any past decisions they've made. I just question the phantom threat. And wonder why the simple answer, a reason where the BoD would benefit, is not even considered. And why the threatening language about the BoD needing to do exactly what they've announced they intend to do, or else.

Baffled....

SGE