Re: New Pacer--THIRD SUPPLEMENTAL JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
posted on
Feb 09, 2010 05:57PM
Thanks, Wolf!----------------------------------------------------------Defendants’ Statement Defendants note that Plaintiffs Acer and HTC were the parties that first requested this stay and have previously requested the Court continue the stay as long as the patents-in-suit were being reexamined by the PTO. Defendants do not oppose either the lifting or a short continuance (i.e. 60 days) of the stay.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------This is what was expected since we are waiting on PTO---I don't think that it is going to take 60 days for them to finish, however. At least I hope not. In the meantime, keep up the good work, DL. GL, ads