<you're suggesting Sirius' counsel wouldn't oppose moving it to California just as much as they'd oppose moving it to Texas? >

Not sure where you are reading the above. Of course they would argue for the case to stay in NY. What makes you think they didn't?

<You're assumption that the existing California cases would be merged w/ the Sirius case and therefore provide judicial efficiency is a POOR ASSUMPTION.>

I doubt the NY court would not transfer the case to Calif if they thought it would be tried separately. Wouldn't such a decision be prejudicial against Sirius?

I think my understanding is more logical, but you are free to believe otherwise.

As you suggest, I'll try to get serious.

Opty