"When two sucessive posts make reference to Ron straight off the bat, I kind of lean to the soapbox pontificating side.......There's a classier way to do this......."

A classier way? Please advise, since you are obviously such a classy guy.

So, based on all that's been said by you in your attacks on me, what do you make of that second post where I agree with Ron and provide the extra info (buy-back requirements) that his post lacked? - where he admitted ignorance of the requirements (and that's not meant as a dig, just a fact). I would characterize that post as totally supportive of Ron's position.

Since you feel that I deserve mindless attacks for having a conflicting opinion on one aspect of Ron's message, am I not deserving of equally mindless congratulations for agreeing with Ron on the other aspect? Apparently not, since you use that second reply as part of your attack.

Probably my last post to you. Sometimes it's just a waste....

SGE