Sure..I think this is awesome for PDSG. The FBI is not just dumb end of a receiveing pipe IMO..they certainly have a vested interest here in the data..how it flows, cost effective for their up users, etc. If they are on the receiving end of this and they like what they see I think this is great news. The FBI and others really took it on the chin with 911 other criminals that could have been caught if information had been shared in a timely manner etc. A cost effective solution that could be easily implemented given the present environment would be a true edge..I just hope our product is more than competative with the next..

Further, the goverment (state and federal) likes to borrow other working models and make it work elsewhere. A strong partner may also see the benefit..especially if we bring something to the table that they do not..I would like to see a partnership as opposed to a sale..because I think the value (based on historic actions by PTSC) would not be fully reflected in the price.

We may have more here than some may suspect. RG may have been more on the ball than others give him credit - maybe not in the implementation stage..but in the overall product picking and seeing the market scenario. FBI, NJ, Alaska, Montana, Baroni,..this stuff is starting to add up..

Given the news today about the CDX upgrades and so forth..the Baroni factor, the new Board member, etc. It looks more and more that we may have a whorthwhile product here at the early stages of market deployment..don't get me wrong, the MMP will likely be our share price driver..but I would sure like to see the car start to run on all cylindars..