I have removed this post twice, and somebody keeps unremoving it. Who ever the Hub Leader is that keeps allowing this post to stand, please justify your action.

And now I suppose I have to waste time (everyone's time) combatting this post. There is no virtually no basis for this claim. The only way this outcome could arrive is if the level of infringement leaned heavily on the patent(s) owned by TPL, and very little on the MMP (i.e., 5%). In such case, the suggested apportionment of award would be totally appropriate/correct.

But to suggest otherwise, especially considering the current circumstance, is completely irresponsible and nothing short of bashing. Bashing is a violation of the 6 rules.

But a Hub Leader chooses to let the post stand....

SGE