"The current status of PTSC, I suggest, therefore makes their appointments redundant, and I do not forsee all of them standing for re-election in October."

The above was posted on 5/5/08 when the share price was at 33 cents and precipitously falling, PTSC had approx $6.4M in cash and equivalents and approx $25.4M in TOTAL assets according to the 10-K for that period. Apparently, per the post you cite, the suggestion at that time was that PTSC was a company on the path to a NASDAQ listing who had outlived the usefulness of its "self-serving" BOD members.

However, NOW, it's apparently simply outrageous of YOU to suggest that at 8 cents, approx $8.5M in cash & equivalents, and TOTAL assets of $28M, it could possibly be worth changing out these apparently no longer "self-serving" BOD members.

How can you justify such an outrageous, though oddly enough, quite similar to the linked post, suggestion!? My my. You should really check your NASDAQ listing requirements as advised. Let me humbly suggest that when you do, you inform some of the other posters here as to what they might be so they to can be equally informed. TIA.