It's Ok, I have found it:

In February 2004, Intel Corporation filed a lawsuit against us in the United States District Court- Northern District of California, case number C040439, in which they are requesting a declaratory judgment that their microprocessors, used by the defendants in our consolidated suit, do not infringe our patent. We filed a counterclaim against Intel contending that they also are infringing on our patent, and Intel asserted an affirmative defense that our 5,809,336 patent is invalid.

Also in February 2004, we filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court- Northern District of California, case number C040618, against Charles H. Moore, Technology Properties Limited, and Daniel E. Leckrone. Charles Moore, a co-inventor of the basic ShBoom technology, is listed as an inventor on several of the issued patents which were divided from the basic ShBoom technology. Moore transferred his interest in the ShBoom technology to Daniel Leckrone and Technology Properties Limited. We are contending that Russell Fish, the other co-inventor from whom we obtained ownership interests in the ShBoom technology, is the sole inventor of certain of the issued patents. We are requesting the court to declare inventorship and ownership on each of our granted patents related to the suits discussed above and other unasserted claims of infringement Patriot believes it has. In March 2005, Judge Fogel issued an order disqualifying our counsel and prohibiting us from using a key witness in the Moore suit and denied hearing a request for reconsideration of his order. We are in the process of interviewing alternative counsel to proceed forward with the Moore suit.

The Intel lawsuit has been stayed pending the results of the Moore lawsuit.

.

.

.

Be well