We could argue till our faces are blue about who is the best candiate.. most qualified...etc.

But at this point... if Stans gets his name on the proxy--- damn straight ill vote for him.... because for me right now.. its more about the message thrown back to the BOD.....shareholders are not happy with the current structure-- lack of transparency...turnover..etc.

I may be against every position Stan could ever stand for in a company.. business..even politics..... but again at this point... all that doesnt matter.... i just want something new...a shot across the bow for the BOD.. and maybe alittle excitement for the investors and shareholders..

is it realistic for Stan to get voted in...... maybe not--- but the effort is well worth it.

My only disagreement is with certain posters requesting SHARE COUNT PLEDGES... please.. there is no way to validate the share count of any posters here. I could open 20 fake gmail accounts and say that each "person" is pledging 100k of shares. I proved this point to another poster several months back when they tried to do this...

If someone can explain a realistic way of proving the amount of shares--- or validating the sharecount with true investor info.... maybe... but until that happens... whatever numbers get thrown around are pure fantasy as far as im concerned...