"From the 3/16/10 Arcelik PR "Over 65....". This appears in only the Alliacense PR (not in PTSC's)."

That's true, BUT, that language first appeared in the "wave" PR, that included the Harman, TPV & Textron announcements and every PR since. I don't think you can consider the Arcelik PR as setting the count at 65+ as Arcelik was clearly license No. 73.

You may have missedthat in the Caterpillar PR, they specifically brought attention to Caterpillar being the 70th licensee. Since the Blue Coat license was announced that same day, and we had 68 licensee's prior to that day, I've counted Blue Coat as No. 69, and Caterpillar No. 70, as that's what the PR states.

IMO, It's pretty clear that they PURPOSEFULLY changed the count from "over 65" to "over 75", and that it was not a typo as you state.

If you have questions, look at the license tally in this post:

http://agoracom.com/ir/patriot/forums/discussion/topics/432450-73-licenses-disclosed-who-missing-for-how-much/messages/1414521#message